Guest Post by Brent M. Dougal and Philip M. Nelson on Patently-O. Dougal and Nelson are Partners in our Orange County office. In today’s age of international commerce, product development often takes…
Read the full press release here.
On September 15, Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP successfully obtained summary judgment for clients Toshiba Corp. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (“Toshiba”) in their defense of a trade…
The Daily Journal has recognized Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP as one of California’s “Top Boutique” law firms. The firm was recognized for their outstanding legal services dedicated to…
As the legal landscape continues to evolve in terms of intellectual property law, the Los Angeles Business Journal once again turned to some of the leading IP attorneys and experts in the…
Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP has scored a $466.7 million verdict for its client, Irvine-based medical technology company Masimo Corp., in a patent infringement case against Philips Electronic North…
The AIA sets a one-year deadline to file a petition for IPR of a patent from the date a complaint for patent infringement is served. 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). There is…
In January 2013, Petitioner IBS filed a petition for IPR. Five months later, IBS filed a second petition for IPR on the same patent claims. The follow-on petition relied on…
Petitioner Unilever filed an earlier petition for IPR of 33 claims of a patent. In the Decision on Institution, the Board denied review of 11 claims and granted review of…
Petitioner Unified filed a petition for IPR of 11 claims of a patent. Unified acknowledged that the patent was already subject to three other petitions for IPR and that the…
