Skip to content
IP + Technology Law
Home  »  News & Insights  »  Publications

Recent Trends In Inter Partes Review Estoppel

November 7, 2017  | Jon Gurka and James Smith

Knobbe Martens attorneys Jon Gurka and James Smith discuss recent district court rulings that have broadened the scope of IPR estoppel while they await the Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal.

View and download the full presentation below.

 

 

This Year’s Top Ten IP Cases from Knobbe Martens – Intellectual Property Law

Related Links

Practice Areas

News & Insights

Blog - IP Practice
Jul 2025
Applicant Admitted Prior Art Can (Sometimes) Show Obviousness
SHOCKWAVE MED., INC., V. CARDIOVASCULAR SYS., INC. Before Lourie, Dyk, and Cunningham.  Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00405. Summary:...
Blog - IP Practice
Jun 2025
Finding Common Ground? — Federal Circuit Clarifies IPR Estoppel
INGENICO INC. v. IOENGINE, LLC Before Dyk, Prost, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: IPR estoppel does not preclude reliance on...
Blog - IP Practice
Jun 2025
No Injury, No Appeal: Patent Owners Must Show Actual Injury for Article III Standing
DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC Before Moore, Clevenger and Chen.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A patent owner lacks Article III standing to...