Skip to content

Inequitable Conduct Found Based on Rule 131 Declaration In Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corp., Appeal No. 12- 1658, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment of unenforceability of…

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, one of the nation’s largest intellectual property law firms, announced its continued commitment to providing the highest quality legal services with the addition of…

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, consistently ranked among the top intellectual property law firms worldwide, has been recognized by U.S. News Media Group and Best Lawyers in their 2014…

In the first instance of a district court interpreting the patent litigation provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“Biosimilars Act”), Judge Maxine E. Chesney (N.D. Cal.) dismissed…

By Doug Muehlhauser and Payson LeMeilleur of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP Receiving notice as in-house counsel that a patent infringement complaint has been filed against your company can…

Late Payment of Patent Maintenance Fees Not Inequitable Conduct In Network Signatures Inc, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Appeal No. 12-1492, The Federal Circuit reversed summary judgment of…

The Downfall of a “Stacked” Wine Stacked Wines, LLC makes individually-packaged glasses of wine that vertically stack to form one full bottle of wine. Stacked Wines sought to register the…

On October 23, 2013, Knobbe Martens Partners Andrew Douglas and Sabing Lee presented on “Preparing Your Medical Device NewCo for IP Due Diligence” at the OCTANe Medical Device and Investor…

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP has secured a decisive victory on behalf of client KFx Medical Corporation.  A jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District…

By: Susan Natland and Brigette Chaput In Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport v SPI Spirits Ltd, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit over…

Older posts
- Newer posts