Skip to content

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications Headshot

Brenden S. Gingrich, Ph.D.

Brenden Gingrich’s practice focuses on the protection of intellectual property, primarily for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. With more than 20 years of experience, Brenden provides strategic advice to clients...

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications Headshot

Mark Kachner

Mark Kachner is a partner in our Los Angeles office. His practice focuses on litigation, client counseling, and licensing intellectual property assets. Mr. Kachner has litigated cases involving a wide...

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications Headshot

Daniel A. Kamkar

Daniel A. Kamkar’s practice focuses on worldwide patent prosecution and portfolio management, patent infringement and validity analyses, freedom to operate analyses, USPTO proceedings, and general IP licensing. Daniel currently assists...

UC v. Broad Institute: No Interference-In-Fact in CRISPR Genome Editing Applications Headshot

Robert J. Hilton, Ph.D.

Robert J. Hilton is a partner in our San Diego office. Dr. Hilton represents a wide array of clients in the pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology, and medical device industries related to...