CUPP COMPUTING AS v. TREND MICRO INC. [OPINION]
Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stark. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Patent Owners cannot attempt to narrow claims by disclaiming claim scope during an IPR proceeding.

AMERICAN NATIONAL v. SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION [OPINION]- PRECEDENTIAL
Before Stoll, Schall, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00497 and IPR2019 00500.
Summary: Once a patent owner includes at least one amendment that is responsive to an instituted unpatentability ground, the patent owner may include more amendments to address other non-instituted grounds, such as potential § 101 and § 112 issues.

Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) announced on November 1, 2022, that it will acquire Abiomed for an upfront payment of $380.00 per share in cash, which equates to about $16.6 billion. The acquisition is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2023. According to reports, after the acquisition, Abiomed “will operate as a standalone business within J&J within Johnson & Johnson MedTech, becoming one of the company’s dozen ‘priority platforms,’ defined by annual sales of at least $1 billion.”

SOCLEAN, INC. v. SUNSET HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Before Newman, Lourie, and Prost. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Summary: A trademark is entitled to a statutory presumption of validity even if the trademark examiner did not follow Patent and Trademark Office procedures during prosecution.

UNILOC 2017 LLC v. GOOGLE LLC
Before Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the District Court for the Northern District of California.
Summary: An “irrevocable” patent license could be terminated by mutual agreement and such a license was not a right that by its nature would fall within a survival provision of a termination agreement.

UNILOC USA, INC. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Before Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
Summary: Failure to vacate an adverse ruling regarding a lack of standing when settling a prior suit collaterally estopped the patentee in subsequent suits for lack of standing

An article from October 2022 states that the global medical device market is projected to jump by seven billion dollars in 2022 and leap to $223 billion over the next seven years, to reach a valuation of around $719 billion by 2029. A report by consulting firm Fortune Business Insights anticipates a 5.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over this period.

FINJAN LLC v. ESET, LLC

Before Reyna, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from the Southern District of California.

Summary: Specific definitions provided in an earlier application in a patent family incorporated by reference into a later patent do not restrict the later patent if that patent does not include the definition.

ABC CORPORATION I V. THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS

Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Summary: Time’s up! The hourglass shape that is the dominant feature in both the asserted design patents and accused hoverboard products does not support a preliminary injunction because it was in the prior art.

ABC CORPORATION I v. PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS

Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Summary: Failure to provide advance notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) leads to vacating of preliminary injunction.