Skip to content
IP + Technology Law
Home  »  News & Insights  »  Publications

Gunn v. Minton: The Supreme Court’s Correction of the Federal Circuit’s Overly Broad Assertion of Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims

July 23, 2013  | Joseph R. Re and Stephen W. Larson

Written by: Joseph Re and Stephen Larson
Publication: New Matter, the official publication of the Intellectual Property Section, State Bar of California
Download PDF

Gunn v. Minton: The Supreme Court’s Correction of the Federal Circuit’s Overly Broad Assertion of Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims Headshot

Joseph R. Re
Partner
Orange County
joe.re@knobbe.com
949-760-0404
Gunn v. Minton: The Supreme Court’s Correction of the Federal Circuit’s Overly Broad Assertion of Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims Headshot

Stephen W. Larson
Partner
Orange County
stephen.larson@knobbe.com
949-721-5301

Related Links

News & Insights

News
Jan 2026
Jeremiah Helm Comments On How Upcoming Supreme Court ‘Skinny Label’ Case Could Impact Hatch-Waxman Litigation
In interviews with Law360 and Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review, Knobbe Martens partner Jeremiah Helm offered insights into the Supreme Court’s decision to hear a petition of the Federal Circuit’s...
News
Jun 2026
Jeremiah Helm Quoted on Supreme Court’s Skinny Label Patent Infringement Decision in Hikma v. Amarin
Knobbe Martens partner Jeremiah Helm was quoted by Bloomberg Law, Law360, and MLex on the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., which...
News
May 2026
Jeremiah Helm Shares Post-Argument Insights on Supreme Court “Skinny Label” Patent Infringement Case, Hikma v. Amarin
Following April 29 oral arguments in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., the closely watched Supreme Court case on whether a generic drug manufacturer can be held liable...