Knobbe/Martens: Intellectual Property Law

Successes

Successes

Masimo Corp. v. Philips (D. Del. 2014)
Knobbe Martens defended Masimo against antitrust claims asserting monopolization, attempted monopolization, tying, conspiracy, group boycott, and restraint of trade.  Masimo filed for summary judgment on Philips’ antitrust claims and the parties thereafter settled the dispute, which also involved patent infringement claims, for a lump sum payment of $300 million to Masimo and a business relationship involving the availability of Masimo technology in Philips products.  (https://www.knobbe.com/news/2016/11/knobbe-martens-client-masimo-enters-multi-year-business-partnership-agreement-philips)

Masimo Corp. v. Philips (D. Del. 2016)
Knobbe Martens represented Masimo in its assertion of antitrust claims asserting monopolization, attempted monopolization and restraint of trade.  The parties settled the dispute as part of their settlement of patent infringement claims and Philips’ antitrust and patent infringement claims.

Masimo Corp. v. Shenzhen Mindray and Mindray DS USA (C.D. Cal. & D.N.J. 2015)
Knobbe Martens defended Masimo against antitrust claims asserting monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, group boycott, tying, and restraint of trade.  Knobbe Martens also assisted Masimo in its defense against antitrust claims in China.  Shortly before trial in California, Mindray agreed to settle the dispute, which also involved patent infringement claims, for a $25 million payment to Masimo and a business relationship involving the availability of Masimo technology in Mindray’s products.

Attorney Finder