Knobbe/Martens: Intellectual Property Law

CONVERSE, INC. v. ITC

By Shuchen Gong and Mark Kachner October 30, 2018
Federal Circuit Summary
 
Before Judges Dyk, O’Malley, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission.

Summary: Registered trade dress carries a presumption of secondary meaning only prospectively from the date of registration.  Prior to the date of registration, the mark owner must show acquired secondary meaning prior to the first infringing use for each accused infringer.

Converse filed an ITC action, asserting trade dress rights covering the design of its All Star shoes.  Converse had used the trade dress since 1932, but the trade dress was not registered until 2013.  Converse relied on both common-law rights and its trademark registration.  The ITC held that Converse’s trademark was invalid because it had not acquired secondary meaning.

The Federal Circuit vacated the determination that Converse’s trade dress lacked secondary meaning. The Federal Circuit noted that trade dress in a product design can never be inherently distinctive, and that secondary meaning must be shown prior to the first infringing use by each alleged infringer.  For infringing uses that began after the registration date, Converse is entitled to a presumption of secondary meaning. For uses that began prior to the registration of its trademark, Converse must show that it acquired secondary meaning prior to the first infringing use for each alleged infringer, without the benefit of the presumption.

To determine if trade dress has acquired secondary meaning, the Federal Circuit set forth a six factor test: (1) association of the trade dress with a particular source by actual purchasers (typically measured by customer surveys); (2) length, degree, and exclusivity of use; (3) amount and manner of advertising; (4) amount of sales and number of customers; (5) intentional copying; and (6) unsolicited media coverage of the product embodying the mark.  In assessing the length, degree, and exclusivity of use, the Federal Circuit stated that the most relevant evidence is the trade dress owner’s and third parties’ use in the five-year period before first use or infringement. The Federal Circuit remanded to the ITC to further analyze secondary meaning. 

This case is: CONVERSE, INC. v. ITC

Editor: Paul Stewart
 

Meet the Knobbe Martens Attorneys

CONVERSE, INC. v. ITC
Shuchen Gong is an associate in our San Francisco Office. Her practice includes licensing, preparation and prosecution of patent applications and trademark prosecution. Shuchen...
CONVERSE, INC. v. ITC
Mark Kachner is a partner in our Los Angeles office. His practice focuses on litigation, client counseling, and licensing intellectual property assets. Mr. Kachner has litigated cases...
Attorney Finder