Knobbe Martens Recognized by Am Law, Law360 for $634 Million Patent Infringement Win for Masimo
A team from Knobbe Martens, along with Sullivan and Cromwell, was honored as lead runner up in Am Law’s “Litigator of the Week” contest for securing a successful verdict on...
Knobbe Martens Guides Masimo to $634M Win Against Apple in Patent Infringement Case
IRVINE, Calif., November 17, 2025 – A team from Knobbe Martens led medical device pioneer Masimo (NASDAQ: MASI) to a victory over Apple in a dispute involving Masimo’s patented heart...
Knobbe Martens Guides X-Ray Technology Pioneer Sigray to Success in Patent and Trade Secret Jury Trial
IRVINE, Calif., September 10, 2025 – A trial team from Knobbe Martens secured a significant success on behalf of innovator Sigray, Inc. in an IP dispute involving groundbreaking x-ray technologies....
Tying Claimed Technological Advancements to Specific Technological Methods Is a Winning POV on Patent Eligibility
CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC v. GOPRO, INC.
Before Reyna, Prost, and Schall. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Summary: Claims are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 where the written description discloses improving technology through specific technological means and the claims reflect that improvement.
Mauricio Uribe Co-authors “Good Faith Doctrine and NFTs – How a Bored Ape NFT Dilemma May Present Unique Copyright and Contract Issues,” for IPWatchdog
Partner Mauricio Uribe and Knobbe Martens summer associate Melis Tirhi co-authored the article, “Good Faith Doctrine and NFTs – How a Bored Ape NFT Dilemma May Present Unique Copyright and Contract Issues,”...
