Aerospace Update | November 2025
Aerospace IP Strategy in View of Recent U.S. Patent Office Updates Tom Cowan Aerospace technology companies often decide between patenting an innovation or keeping it as a trade secret. Typically,...
U.S. Government Aerospace Procurement Updates and Implications for Intellectual Property
The U.S. government has recently signaled changes for development and procurement of weapons and aerospace systems. The government has stressed moving faster in procurement and becoming more self-reliant in manufacturing...
Aerospace Update | September 2025
New 3D-Printable Titanium Alloy to Combat Climate Change Matthew S. Whitehead Pure titanium and titanium alloys, including Ti-6Al-4V, are used in aerospace applications for forming airframes and engine parts because of their...
New 3D-Printable Titanium Alloy to Combat Climate Change
Pure titanium and titanium alloys, including Ti-6Al-4V, are used in aerospace applications for forming airframes and engine parts because of their light weight, high strength, and resistance to corrosion. However,...
Application of Safe Harbor Exceptions to the Anti-Kickback Statute
On August 7, 2025, the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) issued Advisory Opinion 25-09 (“Advisory Opinion”) providing a favorable opinion regarding remuneration to physicians with an ownership interest in a medical device manufacturer....
Aerospace Update | July 2025
Space Technology Investments Clear the Launch Tower in 2025 Tom Cowan Investments in space technology are off to a strong start in the first half of 2025. The rising trend...
Program to Accelerate the Future of Aerospace and Defense Innovation for Startups
On July 16, 2025, PTC, Inc. (“PTC”) announced an “Aerospace & Defense (A&D) Startup Program” (“the Program”) for accelerating the future of aerospace and defense innovation. PTC offers software products...
Department of Defense Releases a New Intellectual Property Guidebook
The Department of Defense (the “DoD”) recently released a new comprehensive guidebook to help navigate intellectual property laws and regulations. The guidebook states: In today’s global military competition, DoD needs...
Argument Forfeited When Raised for the First Time Fourteen Months After an Appeal
ODYSSEY LOGISTICS & TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. STEWART Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary: A patent applicant forfeited...
Stryker Acquires Inari Medical for $4.9 Billion
Stryker Corporation (“Stryker”) recently announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Inari Medical, Inc. (“Inari”) for approximately $4.9 billion. Inari develops technologies and products for treating pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, in-stent...
Relying on Computer-Implemented, Result-Focused Functional Language Is a Bad Bet
BETEIRO, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC
Before Dyk, Prost, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Summary: Recitations of a computer-implemented method can be an abstract idea and non-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 if the claims recite result-focused functional language that is analogous to longstanding “real-world” activities and do not improve technology.
CardioMech Raises $13 Million for Transcatheter Mitral Chordal Repair Technology
CardioMech AS (“CardioMech”) announced that the company successfully raised $13 Million in capital in addition to the $18.5 Million Series A financing in 2020 bringing total funding to $42 Million.
Presidio Medical Raises $72 Million for ULF Neuromodulation Platform
Presidio Medical, Inc. announced that the company successfully concluded a Series C funding round, raising a total of $72 million. The round was led by Deerfield Management, Invus Opportunities, Action Potential Venture Capital, and ShangBay Capital. David Neustaedter, venture partner at Deerfield, joined Presidio’s board in connection with the financing.
Claimed Ranges Overlapping the Prior Art Can Lead To Short Patent Shelf-Life
UCB, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES UT, INC.
Before Moore, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
Summary: District court legally erred by applying incorrect anticipation framework but correctly found that patent claiming a ratio range was obvious over prior art disclosing overlapping range.
