Dozens of Knobbe Martens Partners Recognized in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide
IRVINE, Calif., May 28, 2026 – Knobbe Martens, a leading intellectual property law firm, and its partners were once again recognized for excellence across patent law in the 2026 edition...
Knobbe Martens Maintains National Top Tier Ranking for IP Litigation Work from Benchmark Litigation
IRVINE, Calif., October 28, 2025 – Knobbe Martens is proud to share that the firm and numerous partners in its Litigation practice have been recognized in the 2026 edition of...
Carol Pitzel Cruz and Andrea Cheek Named Among “Women Worth Watching in Leadership” by Profiles in Leadership Journal
SEATTLE and WASHINGTON, D.C., October 3, 2025 – Knobbe Martens congratulates partners Carol Pitzel Cruz and Andrea Cheek for their recognition as “Women Worth Watching in Leadership” by Profiles in...
Knobbe Martens Partners Named Among Top Litigators “40 & Under” by Benchmark Litigation
IRVINE, Calif., August 14, 2025 – Knobbe Martens is pleased to share that partners Andrea Cheek, Kendall Loebbaka, and Adam Powell have been named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2025 “40 &...
Knobbe Martens Obtains Victory for Padagis Pharmaceuticals in Glaucoma Treatment Patent Case
Favorable judgment for Padagis will result in more affordable access to glaucoma medication SEATTLE and WASHINGTON, D.C., February 13, 2025 – A team from Knobbe Martens, led by Carol Pitzel...
Knobbe Martens Hosts AIPLA Women in IP Community Service Event to Support Children Entering Foster Care
WASHINGTON, D.C., February 6, 2025 – Attorneys in Knobbe Martens’ Washington, D.C. office once again hosted the D.C. area AIPLA Women in IP Community Service Event benefitting Comfort Cases®, a...
Ari Feinstein and Andrea Cheek Author Article on Impact of Chevron Overturn in IP & Technology Law Journal
In the article “An Examination of the Impact of Chevron’s Death on Certain Intellectual Property Laws,” partners Ari Feinstein and Andrea Cheek explore the effects of the Supreme Court’s 2024...
Knobbe Martens Practices and Partners Top-Ranked Nationally by Benchmark Litigation
IRVINE, Calif., October 10, 2024 – Knobbe Martens is proud to announce that the firm and over a dozen of its partners have been ranked among the best in IP...
Sixty Knobbe Martens Attorneys Recognized in “Best Lawyers” 2025 Guide
IRVINE, Calif., August 15, 2024 – Knobbe Martens is pleased to share that Best Lawyers in America has included 60 of the firm’s lawyers in its 2025 Guide. The recognized...
Knobbe Martens Gives Back through the AIPLA Women in IP Community Service Event
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 30, 2024 – Knobbe Martens’ D.C. office co-hosted the AIPLA Women in IP Community Service Event for the D.C. area by partnering with Finnegan and Maryland-based nonprofit...
In IP & Tech Law Journal, Andrea Cheek and Ari Feinstein Discuss Patent Venues
Knobbe Martens partner Andrea Cheek and associate Ari Feinstein authored “Patent Venue, and How It Works in Abbreviated New Drug Application Litigation,” published in Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal....
40 Knobbe Martens Attorneys Named Among “Best Lawyers” in 2024 Guide
IRVINE, CALIF., Thursday, August 17, 2023 – Knobbe Martens is pleased to announce that The Best Lawyers in America has named 17 of the firm’s partners to its 2024 edition...
37 Knobbe Martens Attorneys Named Among “Best Lawyers” in 2023 Guide
Irvine, Calif., Thursday, August 18, 2022 Knobbe Martens is pleased to announce that The Best Lawyers in America has named 17 of the firm’s partners to its 2023 edition, an...
37 Knobbe Martens Attorneys Named by Best Lawyers 2022©
Knobbe Martens is pleased to announce that The Best Lawyers in America© has named 13 of the firm’s partners to its 2022 edition and recognized 24 additional attorneys in its “Ones...
NCAA Rules Limiting Education-Related Benefits Violate Antitrust Laws
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION v. ALSTON
Before the United States Supreme Court; Opinion by Justice Gorsuch; Concurring Opinion by Justice Kavanaugh; On writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Summary: NCAA’s restrictions on education-related benefits to student-athletes do not pass antitrust scrutiny; the compensation restrictions were properly subjected to a “rule of reason” analysis.
