sub-header
Subscribe
Back to Results

PTAB

We are involved in all aspects of PTAB proceedings. Turn to our team for the latest in this dynamic space.

Sort Results by Category

Litigation
PTAB
Blog
Routine Optimization of Result-Effective Variable Can Bridge Gaps in P...
|Raymond S. LuBrandon G. Smith
PFIZER INC. v. SANOFI PASTEUR INC. Before Lourie, Bryson, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Evidence that a cla...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
Being Known Is Not Enough
|Geetha Durairaj, Ph.D.Nathan D. Reeves
VIRTEK VISION INTERNATIONAL ULC, v. ASSEMBLY GUIDANCE SYSTEMS, INC., DBA ALIGNED VISION Before Moore, Hughes, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent T...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
PTAB Need Not Address Underdeveloped Arguments in IPR Petitions
|Emily K. McCorryJeremy Anapol
NETFLIX, INC. V. DIVX, LLC Before Dyk, Linn, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The PTAB did not abuse its discre...
Read more
PTAB
Podcast
Funding Strategies in the Generative AI World – Why Patents Should Sti...
|Mauricio Uribe
In this episode of the Knobbe IP+ podcast, Knobbe Martens partner Mauricio A.
Read more
PTAB
Litigation
Blog
Consider the Relevant Technology Carefully Before Claiming Ranges in P...
|Jamal PerryDaniel Kiang
RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. v. PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A Before Chen, Stoll, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. S...
Read more
PTAB
Litigation
Blog
Federal Circuit Instructs PTAB How to Apply Public Accessibility Stand...
|Ben K. ShiromaDaniel Kiang
WEBER, INC. v. PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Before Reyna, Hughes, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Copyright ...
Read more
Section 101
PTAB
Blog
Current Congressional Attempts at Patent Reform
|Philip M. Nelson
In recent years, Congress has considered potential new laws for patent reform, typically changes to the system supported by patent owners. Two mai...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
Prosecution History May Support a Motivation to Combine
|Rhett D. RamseyJacob R. Rosenbaum
Elekta Limited v. Zap Surgical Systems, Inc. Before: Reyna, Stoll, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Patentee’s ...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
IPR Decision Based on a Barely Mentioned Typo Violated the APA Notice ...
|Brianne M. KingeryDaniel Kiang
APPLE INC. v. COREPHOTONICS, LTD. Before Stoll, Linn, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: An IPR final written dec...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
“Magic Words” Unnecessary in Identifying Field of Endeavor for Analogo...
|Raymond S. LuDaniel Kiang
NETFLIX, INC. v. DivX, LLC Before Hughes, Stoll, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Petitioner was not required ...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
A Terminal Disclaimer Is Not an Escape Hatch
|Nefi R. OlivaNathan D. Reeves
IN RE CELLECT, LLC Before Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Obviousness-type double patenting anal...
Read more
Litigation
PTAB
Blog
Weighty Considerations: Objective Indicia of Non-obviousness
|Alistair J. McIntyreBrandon G. Smith
VOLVO PENTA OF THE AMERICAS, LLC, v. BRUNSWICK CORP. Before Moore, Lourie, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summar...
Read more